Ongoing media exposures of the massive salaries
drawn by parastatal bosses may have been welcomed by the public, but
expectations that the government would act on corruption are fast fading –
instead, the matter has fizzled out and become part of Zanu-PF's divisive
battle on who will succeed President Robert Mugabe.
Vice-President Joice Mujuru, who leads one of the
two factions in Zanu-PF that are battling to take over after Mugabe, this week
suggested that the exposures that have become known as "salary-gate"
could be the work of detractors bent on destroying the party from within.
Only the gullible will believe that what we are
being shown in the State media is meant to clean the act. In reality, it only
goes as far as confirming the fact that corruption killed Zimbabwe. And that at
the centre of it all, sits Zanu PF, and its insatiable bigwigs who take and
take without any shame and yet lie and lie with a straight face.
The corruption which has been confirmed today
dates back to the early 90s when the economy slowly gave in to a huge
government and unbridled expenditure.
It’s a fact that at independence in 1980,
Zimbabwe spent a lot of money on health, education and various other sectors to
bridge gaps created by an unfair and unjust system.
Spending on education rose from Z$227,6 million
in 1979 to Z$628m in 1990 while health expenditure went up from Z$66,4m to
Z$188,6m.
A huge public service sector, subsidies, the
10-year involvement in the Mozambican civil war from 1982 to 1992 and then
subsequent drought years further debilitated the economy such that by the
mid-90s prices had become unstable.
The budget operated on a deficit and taxes became
high. This drove public debt higher. To recover lost economic growth, the
government accepted the Enhanced Economic Structural Adjustment Programme
(Esap) in 1991.
The programme that ended in 1995 meant that all
subsidies had to go; public enterprises either be nationalised or privatised to
enhance growth; streamline government by cutting down on expenditure.
Esap was supposed to be a short-term programme
that would first snuff out some jobs in order to create more. But it did not
work. The privatisation or nationalisation of public enterprises without better
management led to further decline in productivity. Government did not reduce
expenditure.
No jobs were created. And the deficit went
further up. Instability chipped in. A few black businesspeople operating as
advocates for black empowerment demanded their entitlements and government
acknowledged them by giving contracts and concessional loans.
This further put pressure on government forcing
it to borrow domestically thereby causing even more instability. Consumer
prices skyrocketed.
Under Esap, government was also forced to fall
into heavy debt and international donors refused to write off the debts because
the Zimbabwean government had failed to honour its part of the deal.
After the failure of Esap, government cooked up
the Zimbabwe Programme for Economic and Social Transformation (Zimprest) in
1996. Zimprest was supposed to be implemented by government, business, labour
and civil society through the National Economic Consultative Just like now when
Zanu PF is trying to make people believe that it’s bent on cleaning up, the
party used the targeted sanctions as a reason for the death of the economy. And
we believed them.
What killed our economy and country is
corruption. Sanctions were a diversionary tactic just like the stage-managed
exposures are a diversionary tactic.